Friday, March 07, 2008
About
The blog is by Rick (evangelical) and Ernesto (RC). Looking for some basic truth beyond semantics...Or maybe that statement is backwards. Maybe we ought to be quibbling over sematics. Maybe someone's in the details, and we should find out who.
Here's a bit of history.
Links
Previous Posts
- Evangelicals Winning!
- Evangelical Catholics?
- A Toast To Long Life
- A Few Thoughts on Religion and Politics From The B...
- Blair Converson Sparks Hostility
- Catholic Primary Issues: Huckabee and the Catholic...
- A Mere Christian View of Romney
- People of Various Faiths Coming To The Defense of ...
- The Golden Compass
- It's Advent and ... Weeeeee're Baaaaack


2 Comments:
Hey, I like the it! And your tacit acknowledgment of infallibility...
Well, as you know, even a broken clock is infallibly correct twice a day. We've discussed the whole infallibility doctrine before and I'm more aware of what exactly it does and does not entail. It still seems like a tautology since the Pope defines what is correct doctrine and the Pope also determines the rightness of the doctrine and the Pope declares the doctrine of infallibility to be correct and right.
If the Pope was required, for instance, to predict under which shell the pea will be found, the concept of infallibility could be proven or disproved. Now, I predict that you will have something to say. So, attempt to prove me wrong and you will at the same time prove me right.
Post a Comment
<< Home